Scoring Employee Competence: Why Likert Scales and Psychometric Testing Fall Short
In working with customers and behavioral scientists over many years, we have learned that the use of Likert scales and psychometric testing methodologies for scoring employee competence is problematic because of several reasons:
- Response Bias: Likert scales rely on self-reported data and are prone to response bias. People may feel pressured to provide socially desirable answers, leading to overestimating their competence.
- Limited Scope: Likert scales and psychometric tests only measure limited competencies. It takes work to capture the complexity of an individual’s skills and abilities in a few questions or tasks.
- Cultural and Contextual Factors: These methods don’t consider the cultural and contextual factors influencing an individual’s performance. For instance, an employee from a collectivist culture may perform differently in a team setting than an individualist culture.
- Lack of Standardization: There needs to be more standardization in the development and administration of psychometric tests, leading to potential errors and inaccuracies in the results.
In conclusion, while Likert scales and psychometric tests can provide valuable information, they should not be relied upon as the sole measure of an employee’s competence. Instead, a more comprehensive and multi-faceted approach, considering the individual’s past performance, potential, and specific job requirements, is necessary to assess an employee’s competence accurately.
Book a demo at [email protected] or call us at +1 (512) 256-4342.
